I ran whole life illustrations for a 48-year-old man with a $300,000 death benefit and put them side by side in a video comparing four whole life designs. Two of them used the same company, the same premium of $7,161 a year, and the same starting death benefit. The only thing that actually differed was the design.

The traditional design put the whole premium into base whole life. After one year, the cash value was $0. After two years, it was $453. The blended design kept the base whole life smaller and blended in supplemental term insurance, which pays the agent no commission, so more of each premium went to paid-up additions. Paid-up additions are extra premium dollars that buy small pieces of fully paid insurance, and they show up as cash value right away. That design had $4,200 of cash value after one year and about $9,000 after two.

The gap lasted: at year 20, both had $143,220 of premium paid in. The traditional design projected $199,000 of cash value, and the blended design projected $218,611. At year 40, the traditional design had taken $286,000 of premium and projected $745,000 of cash value. The blended design had taken $242,000, because its structure limits how much can go in later, and projected $774,000. It was about $29,000 ahead with $44,000 less paid in.

The cleanest way to compare them is the internal rate of return, which means the single yearly rate that would turn your premiums into the cash value. At year 40, the traditional design worked out to 4.21% on cash value and the blended design to 4.64%. Measured on the death benefit, $877,000 against $892,000, the rates were 4.86% and 5.18%. A third design, from a company with a weaker dividend history, projected only 2.59% on cash value after 40 years, which shows how much the company matters too.

The fourth design funded the blended policy at its limit, $18,000 a year for 17 years. It projected about $549,000 of cash value at year 20 and about $1.5 million at year 40, an internal rate of return of about 5% a year on the cash value. Less of each premium went to the agent and to the carrier's early charges, so more of it became cash value you can reach through a policy loan. Why a high cash value policy often has term insurance inside it explains how that blend is built.

None of these numbers are guaranteed. They assume the dividend scale at the time holds steady for 40 years, and it won't hold exactly. The guaranteed columns are lower. A policy loan also reduces the cash value and death benefit until it's paid back.

When you compare whole life illustrations, start with the cash value at the end of year one. A design that shows close to $0 there has put most of your first premium toward commission and early charges.